John2290 said:
I'd call that being indecisve and a complete tool with labels. As silly as the "76 gender pronouns". You could keep on dividing up these catagories but to me at least it just proves that you are an egotistical, attention seeker who cares more about what you label yourself over what you are or believe. |
Wow you got a bit intense in the end there, but no it's the literal definition of the terms. No interpretation.
Athiest = I don't BELIEVE in God
Thiest = I BELIEVE in God
Agnostic = I don't KNOW if there is a God or not
Gnostic = I KNOW there is a God.
You have to be both, there is no choice. Thiesm is about belief, gnosticism is about knowledge.
You either believe in God or you don't, you either know he exists or you don't. ie.
I don't believe in god but I don't know 100% that he doesn't exist.
I don't believe in god and I know for sure he doesn't exist.
I believe in god but I don't know for 100%.
I believe in god, I know he exists.
To be gnostic in anything is illogical. The only viable positions in my opinion is an Agnostic athiest or an Agnostic thiest.
There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'







