By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LipeJJ said:
vivster said:

Which is what's mostly deterring 3rd parties to make games for the Switch. Why put in the work to make just one game for a specific device that's known to shun 3rd parties when you could do one game for a lot more and bigger platforms at the same time?

Also, apart from 1-2-Switch I haven't seen a single game on the Switch that's uniquely made for it. All of the games would work just as well on other consoles or PC.

You should take a look at Arms. And if you become selective and say "oh, you can also play it without motion controls". Yeah, that's true, but then it loses one of its main points (it was made to be more precise/fast than having to use analogs and it also has that curve effect that makes a difference). By that logic everything can run on PC, because in the vast majority of games you can remove important features and still have it playable. But then they are not the same and lose purpose. Some people do care about those differences/features. 

Really? Pretending there aren't readily available motion controls for PC and PS4 that are a lot more accurate to boot? PC certainly isn't the gaming platform that is missing features.

And if ARMS is the only example people can come up with then I guess my point stands.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.