fatslob-:O said:
Agreed, it's as insensitive as you can get for human life especially a one that didn't EVER commit a crime ... (Serial killers are an actual menace to society but Trump ? LOL) There's a reason why the founding fathers went with 'compromise' instead of 'revolution' when it's to keep radical guys like that out of the office ... What's more is that he insinuates that Trump is anti-science when he's as pro-industrialization as anyone could get. There's more to science than just climate change LOL. Did it not occur to the environmentalists that 'industrial science' existed ? There's a reason why oil has a monopoly on life itself when billions depend on it for their survival and quality of life ... If we couldn't use traditional energy and had to settle for the renewable garbage I'd rather all of humanity just die since they took a big step backwards by deindustrializing the whole world spelling the end of modern cilization ... The anti-fossil fuels and anti-GMO people need to shut up and take a look at reality instead fantasizing. I'd rather us use oil if it meant nicer people than not if it meant killing each other ... |
Errr... the job of industrial scientists is to turn science into commercial products and that includes environmental science and renewable tech. The renewables industry is growing internationally as the tech improves so if he really was pro-industrialization he should be supporting the rapidly growing industry. There is no deindustrializing, simply a transition to a different model.
