HintHRO said:
His logic is that a reason to hold back on 4K is because the audience is too limited. This may be true. Full-HD TVs on the other hand are not too limited, still the Switch barely does games in 1080p. Not even games with last gen graphics. So what makes you think Nintendo will fully support 4K resolution when 4K TVs actually are commonly found in households? |
Contrary to popular belief you do NOT need a 4k TV to take advantage of games rendered at 4k.
| curl-6 said: 4K is pointless. 1080p's good enough, anything over that is just a waste of money and processing power in my opinion. |
1440P seems to be the sweet spot now as far as affordable tech for the resolution is concerned, even mid-range graphics hardware like the Radeon RX 580 and Geforce 1060 slay that resolution.
| Dyllyo said: This is no surprise at all. Remember when the Wii came out? Gamers were pissed it wasn't HD. Reggie simply said "Sorry, we don't feel like enough people have HD tvs to justify making an HD console". They'll go 4K eventually probably, but with games that have a timeless, artistic aesthetic, you don't really NEED to rely on resolution to make a gorgeous game. |
And because of such the Wii aged extremely poorly and didn't last for very long time on the market.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
