JWeinCom said:
No, I shouldn't have. I read what you wrote, and interpreted it to the best of my capabilities, in what I think was a justified interpretation. Then, I asked you to explain it. Instead of just saying, "what I actually meant was..." you got defensive about it. And, for some reason, you thought me interpreting your post wrong (whether I was justified in doing so or not) was so offensive that it demanded an apology... which baffles me. But, I did look through the topic again (I had looked through it before and I guess I missed it), and apparently Curl thought the exact same thing when reading your initial post. When he pointed it out, you again accused him of a strawman argument instead of clarifying yourself. So, either we're both very poor readers, or you did a bad job at expressing your opinion. Since 2 people interpretted it that way, the fault more likely lies with you. |
Yeah, ok, with that logic I suppose there is no point arguing with you. There is no self reflection on your part. Just more and more assumptions and accusations. I'm done with this topic.








