StuOhQ said:
160rmf said:
I base my logic on console generation using the history itself: "Switch is 8 gen console because is competing with PS4 and X1".
X360 also did that with PS2 and also Dreamcast with N64 and PS1.
"Bu-but X360 and Dreamcast were more powerful than it's competitors!"
Arguing about power on a discussion about generations is beyond ridiculous, bc you are arguing against the whole definition of "generation". Nintendo before always participate in a generation with a portable and a home console.
But now they started a new cycle with a whole new device. This pretty much confirmed the beginning of a new generation for me.
|
Dreamcast and 360 are commonly accepted to be 6th and 7th gen consoles respectively. We'll see about the Switch. Labeling it now does't make any sense.
|
And they were also accepted as new generation gaming consoles the moment they released.
Why people don't accept Switch as a new generation console? I already addressed the power, its current competitors and portability as pointless arguments for this discussion.