irstupid said:
In the OP during the interview he says that showing indies at E3 is a waste of space. to me that sounds like zero advertising for indies at e3. E3 which is like the superbowl for video games. blogs, youtubes, other events are pathetic in comparison. They get like a fraction of a fraction of coverage and veiwership. Thus my point still stands. 60 million potential customers means nothign if only 1% of them hear of the game. Meanwhile if Nintnedo showcases it, then lets say half the userbase see it. Half of 5 million is much higher than 600k. |
E3 is the biggest gaming event that is for sure.....but to say the other events are pathetic in comparison is just silly. Sure they are not as big but they are by NO means pathetic. So getting that advertisment and stage time at any of those events would GREATLY benefit any developer. And you can't be serious to think that in the day and age of social media/the internet only 1% of 60 million would hear about said games....like that isn't even realistic.
It is like you are dismissing Sony and giving them only the lowest possible outcome.....freaking 1% of 60 million. But are so optimistic with Nintendo and assuming 50% of their userbase will see it......why because they showed it at E3? No matter how you put it the higher chance lies with more consumers. So again looking at the numbers of Switch owners and the number of PS4 owners the clear choice would be Sony.
The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...
PSN: StlUzumaki23







