By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
routsounmanman said:
V-r0cK said:

BraLoD is correct.  

Who told Nintendo to make a tablet/hybrid to begin with?  I swear people deliberately forget that Nintendo has the decision to make a system equal or greater than their competitors.

This is nothing more than the result of Nintendo's decision, which anybody could've seen a mile away, when making a significally weaker console than the competitors in which developers are more accustomed to.

Actually, they cannot. MS and Sony go on an arms race, often taking heavy losses as they drop prices and sell at a loss. They use money from other divisions to fund their gaming deficits. Nintendo simply cannot do it, as they are a much smaller company.

Curiously I always hear how much better Nintendo is financially than Sony... and funnier than that PS4 were released making profit on 1SW and PSN+ sold together... and less than 6 months after the HW was breaking even alone.

Goodnightmoon said:
DonFerrari said:

To both... Fifa 14 on consoles launch had a missing feature on PS4 and PS4 were always the main seller of the game... and even with a gimped port it outsold X1 version... so stop with all the excuses for not buying 3rd party content on Nintendo and still demanding more to be released and not sold. Because we all hear how Nintendo is the best that there is and that no 3rd party is competent and how all their games are bad and generic. So why do you want them?

I'm not making excuses, Fifa 2018 on Switch will be the best portable soccer experience ever, the missing feature won't stop me if I was interested, I just don't like most realistic sport games at all so I don't care, but in this case I was just pointing that all that conversation about blaming Nintendo for the "downgraded" port is stupid, cause nobody was talking about graphics or anything related with the tech, just a missing feature.

Other consoles had gimped ports with missing features and there weren't breakdowns and poor sales.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."