routsounmanman said:
Actually, they cannot. MS and Sony go on an arms race, often taking heavy losses as they drop prices and sell at a loss. They use money from other divisions to fund their gaming deficits. Nintendo simply cannot do it, as they are a much smaller company. |
Curiously I always hear how much better Nintendo is financially than Sony... and funnier than that PS4 were released making profit on 1SW and PSN+ sold together... and less than 6 months after the HW was breaking even alone.
Goodnightmoon said:
I'm not making excuses, Fifa 2018 on Switch will be the best portable soccer experience ever, the missing feature won't stop me if I was interested, I just don't like most realistic sport games at all so I don't care, but in this case I was just pointing that all that conversation about blaming Nintendo for the "downgraded" port is stupid, cause nobody was talking about graphics or anything related with the tech, just a missing feature. |
Other consoles had gimped ports with missing features and there weren't breakdowns and poor sales.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







