By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. on 18 June 2017
Edit Thread
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

I agree they didn't die, but nonetheless that was the image they had and they changed it.

I didn't cared about Apple there and I don't like Apple now, but for the people that buy from them the image changed a lot.

Well, with MS console department I can understand why you think it would be throwing money at a pit.

We still got ye old "PS has no games" label tossed around last gen and this gen, then we had it applied to Xbox, despite Xbox actually having games like Sony had.

People buy them for their name, not what they do these days, I'd hardly call that good for eevryone tbh, yeah they make wads of cash, but so do oil rig companies that cause spills as well, yay for oil, bad for spills.

I'm talking for anything in general, just throwing money and always expecting good results.

The PS3 has no games remark only existed at the beginning of the gen. By mid gen Sony had more ips than Microsoft and nintnedo and they were bleeding internally from saving blu ray. It's foolish to underestimate sonys first, second and third party as it always reaches its height past past the first two years and then they stay consistent until the next console is revealed. MIcrosoft is the opposite where the start with lots of third party exclusives without ips we don't own and stay stable with the same exclusives until it becomes noticeable at the end of the gen that they cannot keep up with successful ip development.