| obieslut said: meh, wiki is full of shit anyway |
I find this attitude very ironic from a user of this site. Wikipedia has a tremendous amount of useful and accurate information on just about anything you can think of. It does get some stuff wrong. But it has a bad reputation because it's not a proffesional encyclopedia and the idea sounds like it would be innacurate.
Then there is VGchartz, a website with a tremendous amount of useful and accurate information for just about anything sales related to videogames today. It does get some stuff wrong. But it has a bad reputation because it's not a proffesional firm and the idea of one guy trying to take a tiny sample size and extrapolate from there sounds like it would be innacurate.
You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.
