Spencer: We Don’t Hold Back Content from Other Platforms (Marketing Deals)

[Machiavellian]

Neodegenerate said:

Machiavellian said:

First off I thought we were debating on what he said you know his actual words.  If that is the case, a game is not content, its a product.  DLC, Ingaem CONTENT, items within the game you can either purchase or get updated is considered content.  So no, if I am taking his words to mean content in a game and keeping it permanently from other platforms then I see nothing he has done while running the division where he has done this practice.  

If you are going to call someone hypocritical, you first need to understand the context of what a person is saying first.  Time exclusives are not content.  There is a clear distinction between the 2.

So because I don't get 1% of it for me it no longer qualifies as content?  Sounds like someone is cherrypicking how content is defined to fit their narrative in this conversation.  If I can't access the product, I also can't access the content of that product.  They are hand in hand, not separate.

So let me get this straight from the bolded part.  In your opinion when someone says content, you immdediate think of the Product.  So when someone says ingame items, DLC, skins, etc.  You have no way to decern the difference between the game and the items in the game.  This is pretty much what you are saying.  So to take that further, with all the exclusives Sony has paid for with either 1st, 2nd or 3rd party, if you were an Xbox or Nintendo gamer, Sony would be denying you as a gamer those games because you are denied the content within them.  Do you see how silly this is making your statement.