By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rafie said:
Imaginedvl said:

Yah... Oppinions :) 

How showing less games (far less), not having any kind of show and basically the equivalent of just projecting a YouTube channel full of trailers on a big screen (and calling it a conference) makes Sony conference slightly better than what Microsoft did?

Yah....for downplaying! :)

Seriously I already said that MS had a better presentation than Sony. I didn't say slightly...I said it was better. Take a look at my post again. As for the games, yes I did give Sony the slight edge because it's pretty debatable here. What's not debatable is that Sony still has more exclusives as a whole (if we were to count the ones like Ni No Kuni 2, that were announced before E3). I do agree that Sony's presentation was bad. MS was good, not great...but good. It still wasn't better than Ubisoft's. That number on the poll is alarming. The varied consensus throughout social networks is that Ubisoft and Nintendo pretty much took E3. MS definitely didn't win. Not that it matters anyway.

Exactly. Sony only showed an hour worth of content. They took the nintnedo approach where they showed their first party, vr and marketing deal content. Very unusual of them. They could've easily Donne what Microsoft did and showed a ton of third party and timed exclusive content but they did not. They kept it real, pretty much. Once that timed exclusivity is up there's not much Microsoft can do to stop Sony.