By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. on 14 June 2017
Edit Thread
Imaginedvl said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Gamespot sat down with Phil spencer and called him out on the validity of the "22 exclusives". Phil stood his ground but I'm glad he got the picture that people are paying attention. With that he admitted they really need to work on their first party

No matter what he said. Those are exclusives. I'm going to repeat here as you may have missed it but:

They showed 42 games and 22 were exclusives to the Xbox ecosystem (Xbox One and/or Windows 10, timed or not, it is still an exclusives too). That's way more than Sony for sure... So as an Xbox gamer, I was pretty happy yes :)

I mean, you seem to have a real fixation on this exclusivity thing, then yes, if you want games that can ONLY be played on one box, then looks like Sony is doing exactly that. And you should care for it; but as an Xbox gamer, I prefer what Microsoft is doing and having an exclusive that can work on both Windows 10 and Xbox One is a huge advantage over what Sony is offering. They showed 42 games and 22 were exclusives to the Xbox ecosystem (Xbox One and/or Windows 10). That's way more than Sony for sure... So as an Xbox gamer, I was pretty happy yes :)

You're saying I have a fixation on this. gamespot spoke to Phil about this too. If you didn't notice I have an Xbox too, but Phil spencer cannot rightfully say he's the better man withthese desperate tactics.