naruball said:
Ljink96 said:
They probably get shit from Sony fanboys or Microsoft fanboys and vice versa. If they get shit from Nintendo fanboys, that's just sad. The thing with 1st year ports is, it allows for something to be on a relatively new console so that there is time to create new content later down the road. I think a lot of the issues stem from the fact that a lot of companies use this as a simple cash grab without adding any new content and just porting the game over. That's where I think people have issues with ports. Nintendo however is releasing ports with updated free content. And it's not like Nintendo is banking on ports from March to March, they have a ton of new content coming this year. So, I really can't say I agree with giving Nintendo a hard time over ports that add free content just to get the ball rolling.
|
It is. The Last of Us thread alone got over 200 comments. The argument from Ninty fans was that NInty remasters make sense because they are of games that are old. If you read the thread, most Ninty fans said the game has to be at least ten years old for the remaster to make sense. And that remastering a game tha came out 1-2 years before, is just [insert insult here]. I find that pretty sad, as that argument was thrown out of the window the second NInty started doing the same.
|
The main difference is that TLOU: R didn't add any new content, Mario Kart 8 Deluxe and Pokkén Tournament DX do add new stuff, even if we ignore the added benefit of portability.
