| Azuren said:
No, no it doesn't. And I honestly don't know why I'm even discussing it with you at this point; clearly someone with an Arms Avatar is just about as likely to admit its deserved sub-90 score than a republican is to admit a wall is a stupid idea. Arms is a boring game with a very Nintendo premise that, if made by anyone else, would get ignored. If it gets a 90, it got it from a Nintendo bump- not through its own value. |
You don't want to discuss because it would show that you're not as informed as you claim you are, though trying to say the game has no depth already shows you know nothing. Just as a start, the basic attack > grab > guard > attack triangle that is in most fighting games is here as one would expect, but one of many things new to the genre is how there's aiming involved via curving your punches. Since punches have range, movement and spacing are especially important as the further your opponent the longer it takes for your punch to reach them then return to you. I could go on and on with the many different mechanics, ARMS, characters, stages, and so ons but I've made my point already, there is undeniably depth to this game.
So preemptive denial, very well then!
