Seeing how many young people on this forum actually defend this decision makes me kind a sad. The US had to pay a shit load of money to get cleaner since energy efficiency isn't known in the US. Just look at the tonnes of CO2 per capita and compare that to Germany or Japan which rely on industry a lot more than the USA. I also don't get the hate for China in this case. At this moment China is actually investing in green energy and making everything cleaner. It's also an enormous productive country if anything it's amazing it took as long as it did for China to be the biggest polluter. If the Paris Agreement are the goals a country has it should invest in a circular and energy efficient economy. Take Denmark for instance, if you produce industrial heat in Denmark you are forced to reuse it. Saving energy, make a transition to a new industry based on refining biological products instead of fossil ones and producing sustainable energy to make it al running is what Europe is putting it's money on. At this moment energy conversion seems to be a problem which needs solving but even ghe first industrial hydrogen plants that convert electricity in hydrogen are being planned in Rotterdam. Saying no to climate change and becoming more sustainable will set the US miles back when it comes to innovation and will stall the economy eventually. But by that time Trump is grabbing his wife by the pussy yet again.
Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar
