forest-spirit said:
I don't know where he got the part about regretful sex from. The law does include having sex with a person that is unconscious, asleep, intoxicated, severly frightened; have an illness, mental illness, disability; is in a particularly dependent situation. What Aeolus left out though, is that you have to abuse or take advantage of these situations for it to be considered rape. Having sex with a drunk person isn't illegal. Having sex with a person too drunk to give consent or understanding what's going on however, could be. Using this law to point out how evil feminists are pushing their influence down our throats is just plain silly and worthy of many face-palms.
It's also true that a region tried to push for a law forcing men to sit while peeing but once again a number of details were left out. The bill was written by Vänsterpartiet, a socialist party, and it was limited to public facilities in the region and only to some toilets. It wasn't a bill for making it illegal for men to stand and pee, it was a bill to force men to sit while using certain toilets. The motivations for the bill was hygienic, to prevent pee on the floor; improving working conditions for cleaners and a study that showed how sitting and peeing emptied the bladder better, which in turn led to lowered risks for prostate cancer and better sex life. The bill didn't pass. But I guess it's much more fun to just say 'Evil feminists wants to make it illegal for men to stand and pee!!!' and call it a day.
How any of these are good points to show how feminists are forcing their bad influence down our throats I do not know. |
I said nothing about feminists being evil. I said that modern feminists don't care about the equality of women or the sexes but rather their own agendas that have nothing to do with equality.
To that bolded part, did you read that before you pressed submit? Forcing you by lawy to sit and pee is the same as making it illegal to stand and pee. 
