By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGPolyglot said:
Aeolus451 said:

Well, in sweden. the definition of rape has been broadened to include regretful sex and sex under the influence of anything mind altering regardless if their partner is under the influence of the same thing.

Feminists in other european countries are pushing for the same thing.

In a certain part of Sweden, a law to make it illegal for males to pee while standing up was pushed.....

Umm, show where they included regretful sex? Because I know that they made it much braoder than other countries, but regretful sex? I don't believe that. And where's the context for making it illegal to pee while standing up? Show me that too.

If a woman is a regretful of sex, she can easily claim she was raped with the broader definition depending on her state of mind during it. If she was on any medication, drank any alcolhol or if her state of mind was altered, she could claim she was raped. She can say she changed her mind at some point or that you used unlawful coercion, both are considered rape.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_Sweden

"The sexual act can be intercourse, but also other sexual acts because of coercion or other circumstances are serious offensive can lead to a person convicted of rape. Anyone who exploits someone who is asleep, unconscious, drunk or under the influence of another drug, mentally disturbed, sick or otherwise is in a particularly vulnerable situation, was also convicted of rape."

Prime example of this sort of crap is the rape allegations against Juliun Assange. Granted the charges were later dropped but the damage has been done to his reputation and wallet.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/dec/17/julian-assange-sweden

"We understand that both complainants admit to having initiated consensual sexual relations with Mr Assange. They do not complain of any physical injury. The first complainant did not make a complaint for six days (in which she hosted the respondent in her flat [actually her bed] and spoke in the warmest terms about him to her friends) until she discovered he had spent the night with the other complainant.

"The second complainant, too, failed to complain for several days until she found out about the first complainant: she claimed that after several acts of consensual sexual intercourse, she fell half asleep and thinks that he ejaculated without using a condom – a possibility about which she says they joked afterwards.

"Both complainants say they did not report him to the police for prosecution but only to require him to have an STD test. However, his Swedish lawyer has been shown evidence of their text messages which indicate that they were concerned to obtain money by going to a tabloid newspaper and were motivated by other matters including a desire for revenge."

Here's the thing, any woman could do the same thing to any man in sweden and he'll likely go to prison because he wouldn't have the money for decent lawyers. 

------------------------------------

Here's a source for the "unlawful to pee while standing". 

http://www.torontosun.com/2012/06/14/swedish-council-member-wants-men-to-urinate-sitting-down

 

Anyway, I'm done with topic because you guys will have me chasing sources for everything while some of you only bring up anecdotal evidence to support your claims that modern feminism isn't so bad.

I've proved my point well enough for vgchartz.