| StarOcean said: That's how opinions work, broski. If I think its shit because the battle system is garbage, I will call it as such. And again, you regurgitate that because the bar is low, it means Nintendo should not put any effort in because other devs do. Fuck that. I ain't letting Nintendo off the hook because its Nintendo. That is the only reason youre defending the game. I dont know why youre so keen on trying to defend trash with trash. You do see the issue, right? The fact you have to say "well its not as bad as this!" is a sign that the game is not up to par. You know the game is good when you get to say, "Man this game is as good as". If youre on the defensive then your game is flawed. The game sucks. Using a game from however many years prior to defend a game from past year isnt good. Plus youre comparing a turn based RPG to an open world RPG. Compare it to a turn based one from recent times (after 2010). |
Except I didn't defend the game I didn't even mention the game I'm pulling you up on your false claim that RPGS hinge on their battle system on whether they're good or not which is complete bullocks it comes down to the overall package and execution on what they're aiming to do hence the Morrowind example which you had no counter to other than to get personal but hey if you want a slanging match let me know we can start any time you want if all you want is to trade shots, want a recent example in the 2010s Pandora's Tower.
Opinions can also still be built on notions that are false, don't think that because it's an opinion that it makes it untouchable.
