| Mar1217 said:
You're really wanna have the last word don't you ? |
Sure we can go with that.
| Goodnightmoon said:
Definitely but we already have long discussions about this in other threads time ago, the debate is getting sterile at this point, specially when there is so much proud in the middle. Game was charming, gorgeous, fun, hilarious, well written, with a lot of variety in the levels and it didn't felt or looked generic beyond the clonic Toads, but oh, it didn't had the same combat system as the first 2 Paper Mario so is complete shit and deserves to burn in hell... yeah, I don't think so. |
And yet even after all the discussions, you still think that is a reason and the only reason. Makes it even cuter that you were trying accuse others of being ignorant.
| Wyrdness said:
Sorry but that is non-sense the are a significant number of RPGs that have average or flawed battle systems but are still good what takes this even further is that many people view rpg battle systems as lacking anyway, what makes any RPG good is the overall package. |
Having crappy gameplay most certainly sours the overall package especially when gameplay generally makes up the majority of the game. What are some of those significant number of RPGs? I would bet their gameplay isn't nearly as bad and they actually have thought put into their story and characters.
