| HappySqurriel said: Boycotts are one of the most powerful ways an collection of individuals can express their displeasure with a corporation. I believe that they're heavily under-used and that people should follow through with their promises of boycotts far more often; I could be wrong but almost all legislation that the government brings up dealing with the negative side effects of corporate actions could have easily been handled through organized boycotts. With that said, the "Ubisoft Boycott" can not really be called a boycott because (for the most part) people are not choosing to not buy a product they were going to buy as a way of sending a message to Ubisoft; all of these games that people are refusing to buy wouldn't have been purchased by these people regardless of the actions of Ubisoft. |
You have pretty much summed it up completely, none of us were going to buy imagine: babies so it really doesn't effect ubisoft too much. Althought before they made those comments I was considering buying Red Steel 2 but now I have pretty much made up my mind not to buy it because they are assholes. So I guess it has worked a little.
^Guy pissing on Microsoft Sign
