Boycott or no, their reputation is still important. If they are so cheap, the only quality Wii games aren't even the ones they develop (yushire seems to forget we already made that rule with No More Heroes), there is no conflict of interest. It still shows they are being cheap when it comes to the Wii.
And despite how some deny it, we do have HD console owners who said they would boycott Ubisoft games, even though they don't have a Wii. That means they would boycott the ones Ubisoft would actually spend money on. Why? Well a combination of principle (it's mainly those who never liked the Wii in the first place who don't get that), and the fact that if Ubisoft can be cheap to one system, what's to stop them from being cheap all around?
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
