Jim sterling gives Mario Kart 8 Deluxe a 9/10.

[Goodnightmoon]

pokoko said:

Goodnightmoon said:

Of course is not that important, is people like you that makes it important, whenever anyone says something bad about jim review someone like you come to shit about people for not accepting his score or have doubts aboutr his intentions, and then that people defend themself and all this conversation starts so you can say "is not important get over it" what if you get over it too? The review was suspicious so some people is gonna have their doubts, period, easy enought to understand.

There is nothing about Jim review that hurts my ego, that's such a stupid and random statement, specially when we talk about the best rated game in a decade, however his review was very suspicious and anyone with half a brain saw it, so I have all the right to express my suspicious about it without you fucking around, stop with your bullshit already and be consistent with yourself for once in your life, I'm suggesting Jim is a calculated sensationalist which is something you have been saying for years, but your level of hypocrisy is so ridiculously big that you shit about me for saying the same thing you have been saying about him for years, its ludicrous. 

Do you ever read over what you've written?  You remind me a lot of Alex Jones or another one of those political pundits with the way you twist everything around to one side.  It's all about you and your faction.  You can't even understand anything anyone says to you without running it through your console warz filter first.

I've explained to you the way I think his review scores work, and that his scores now are consistent with what he's been doing for years.  Because I say that his scores are extremely subjective in no way means that I think he's making them up completely.

By all means, express your opinion.  However, I have the right to express my opinion when someone says that a reviewer is giving one game a high score because he gave another game a low score.

It may sound ridiculous, but it isn't. First he creates a huge polemic by giving the most important Nintendo game ever a 7, a perfectly calculated movement, a 7 is considered a good score in absolute terms, but at the same time every gamer knows a 7 in the gaming industry means pure mediocrity, perfect score to make people mad and at the same time make them look ridiculous because "a 7 is a great score", then later in order to kill any possible rumour of biasement he gaves a Nintendo game a huge score. Solved. Problem is the game he has choosen to give a 9 is a game from a franchise we know he hates, he didn't even reviewed the WiiU version because he was not interested, he gave MK7 a 5/10 because is "just more mario kart" and then he gaves a 9 to an enchanted Mario Kart port?.... I'm sorry, but you want to see only fanboyism in my doubts even when there is clear reasons to remain suspicious.