VGPolyglot said:
Green098 said:
Are these game developer's selling their games for hundreds of thousands a copy? And one game can be rented to hundreds in a lifetime to people who will never go and buy the actual the game itself and contributing the developer, people who rent a house are most likely going to end up buying one for themselves at some point.
If the game developer leased some sort of special rentable copy of the game to retailers for a much higher price or in which they get a cut of the earnings then that would create a much smaller negative impact on the developer and they themselves would willingly allow for for their game to be rented.
Anyways the money the game developers spent developing a game is often millions, and then sold for $60. The money the builder put's into to building the house is a lot less than the amount it is sold for, unlike the game developers who risk and invest millions in the creation of game.
The renter buys game for $60 and makes that money back and huge profits quickly.
The house renter invests hundreds of thousands to slowly earn money over time.
|
But that begs the question, when would rental be allowed and when would it not? Should we ban the practice of renting in general? How far does it go?
|
Well just like with what happened to DVDs, it might just die out in time due to a shift to digital. Even now renting games and etc. was a much bigger thing years ago than now so we're all aleady within that process.
Game developers could always even one day rent games digitally one day in the future themselves, or like netflix become part of a subscription service.
