By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pearljammer on 06 June 2008
Edit Thread
starcraft said:
makingmusic476 said:
 

Kyros? Don't you mean Starcraft?

Starcraft was commenting on what the author of the original article said, and the author never said anything like "best games of the generation." That's my point. The ps3 has quite a few good exclusives, and that number will only continue to grow. That's all the author was trying to say.

And I notice Starcraft ignored my post. :|

@pearljammer: I agree completely. :)

Sorry makingmusic, I missed it.

At the end of the day, if the PS3's current exclusives allow it to garner a 9 for games in this reviewers eyes, he clearly isn't holding out much hope for the consoles future exclusives quality.

Thats why that line is the most questionable part of the review (to me). I don't think he was trying to imply it would continue to grow. If he were making assumptions about the future, he would have included XMB. (actually, he did include the assumption Home would be good, thereby inflating the score).

@ Pearljammer.

If you have any reasonable argument why AAA should be condsidered something other than the 90% cut-off, I'm listening.

 


Uhm, your're asking why AAA should be considered something other than an arbitrary number? Well, personally I would go by the general user consensus. However unreliable it is, I think it is much better than an arbitrary number.

But if you'd like to go your route, I'd say anything above 87.2. That's a much better number than 90