SpokenTruth said:
They are against it because it's a horrible bill. It would establish equal time share for both parents regardless of circumstances. One could be a loving, capable parent that works full time while the other is a crack addict with no home and no job and they would still be required to split time evenly. Even if the parents acknowledge and agree that one should have much more time with the children, they can't...law forces them to split time evenly anyway. They aren't against it because it balances time sharing rights. They are against it because it's incredibly bad for the children. And the Republican governor of Florida even vetoed the bill. You know it's a bad bill when feminists and a very conservative politician agree on why it's bad. |
lol. I take it you're not a fan of the horseshoe theory?







