Should all beliefs be tolerated?

[Jumpin]

palou said:

This has come to my mind when thinking about religious diversity.

 

 

I am generally utilitarian, and of the conviction that adversity must be limited.

 

I do, however, believe in a certain right to believe what you want.

 

 

What I propose is a disctinction of beliefs that cannot be tolerated

 

 

 

1. One must not sell superiority, through faith or any arbitrary quality among believers (see: caste system.). It must not give the right to judge others because of their beliefs, or instigate excessive fear of the lack of belief, attacking the irrational.

 
2. One must not oppose the fundamental rights of any human, can not take away their right to free speech, and more importantly, free thought.

3. One must not promise you rights which are not yours according to law.

4. One must be open to debate, questioning. It cannot sell itself as infallible, and must allow, or even encourage the exploration of other ideas, particularly amongst youths. 


If a philosophy/religion/sytem of beliefs fails to fulfill any of the above, I believe it must be adjusted accordingly, and only then tolerated by society.

 

This would all be to reduce adversity and prevent infectious thoughts that attack our irrationality.

 

 

So, what do you think?

What about outside of religion? Such as with cultures like communism, fascism, mens rights activism, tea-party/alt-rightism, nationalism, and other such ideologies which fail the tests?