Should all beliefs be tolerated?

[bdbdbd]

VGPolyglot said:

bdbdbd said:

So, we wouldn't need to worry if people are doing what they actually enjoy instead of making energy and food people need to live their lives?

The problem is not that we don't have enough food or energy. The problem is that we're not using the resources efficiently. Of course there's going to be work, but the current system works in a way that not everyone even can work. There's always unemployed people.

It is irrelevant if we have enough food and energy now, but will we have enough food and energy after everyone does what they actually enjoy, instead of working. And this was your suggestion.

The problems with food we currently have, are not because of efficiency or the lack of it, but because the poor people do not have enough money. 

There will always be unemployed people, but they're not the same people all the time, a spouse may be one that works and social welfare should keep the people from not needing to worry about if they get to eat and live when they're unemployed.

VGPolyglot said:

bdbdbd said:

As I already said, it's easy support something when you know it's not going to happen. Yes, the majority would need to oppress the rest into communism. What would make it better than national socialism? The result in the end is the same anyway, everyone's happy and those that aren't, are either dead or oppressed. But the majority is happy. 

No, because Nazism relies on perpetual conflict to exist. It's still based on an economic system with winners and losers, so even when everything's homogenous, there'll be issues.

But so does communism rely on perpetual conflict. This is what people are pointing you out. There's no problem after people accept (and keep accepting) the ideology of communism or national socialism, or any other ideology there is. The rest are either dead or oppressed.