LordTheNightKnight on 06 June 2008
| FaRmLaNd said: Well one thing people need to realise is that not developing for the wii doesn't instantly mean financial bankruptcy. However they probably had the engines working on the pc, ps3 and 360 and didn't want to port it to the wii at the time or something. It doesn't matter anyway because it sold over 10 million copies WW without the wii (yes it sold more then 10 million the PC does exist). |
That's only stated for big developers, who need a diverse range of platforms to ensure profitability. Since Activision, which own IW, is supporting the Wii, and they are the most profitable 3rd-party right now, it doesn't matter if one of their studios doesn't feel a few games need to be on it.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
