pearljammer on 05 June 2008
Is it just me or does it seem silly to accredit AAA status with an arbitrary review average? Since when did 90+ aggregate reviews define AAA games?
Sure, you could argue it may be the best objective way to look at it, but I ask, why the 90? Why not 89? 88? 87.32?
From a teaching perspective, could I honestly say that a student who scored a 89 in my course had learned more than a student who scored an 88? I fail to see how this cut off of 90 is at all useful.
