N64 Was A Sales Beast And Should Have Won Its Generation

[VGPolyglot]

RolStoppable said:

pokoko said:

More like you backing yourself into a corner with buttons and "more of the same", which you are now trying to deflect by ignoring.  You made a hypocritical statement and you got called out for it, now you're pretending it didn't happen.  You've been making a lot of missteps lately.  Maybe you're trying too hard?

I mean, what about my questions?  Maybe you missed them, so I'll repost:  "So placement is the key difference between evolution and revolution?  Or is it shape?  So if the right analog stick was on a different area of the controller or it was shaped differently, then it would be revolutionary."

As for the c-controls, isn't it obvious that the button approach ("more of the same") wasn't the answer?  I mean, what is the Switch using?

Meanwhile, buttons appearing on a different part of the controller is something much more meaningful?

Yes, shoulder buttons vs. no shoulder buttons is much more meaningful than C-buttons vs. second stick.

You have yet to explain how a second stick was revolutionary.

First-Person games, left stick to move, right stick to look, in a way much more precise than previously possible on consoles (obviously PC had mouselook).