GhaudePhaede010 said:
Did you literally say, "solid" and, "terrible" when talking about Wii U's first year? You are going to debate that one with yourself before you engage me. Meanwhile, most of those, "late ports" were like, one week... and people here, in this thread and other threads on these forums, are asking for... get this now... EVEN MORE LATE PORTS!!!!!!! Basically, this shows how out of touch the gaming community is when it comes to Nintendo finding success. The goalposts are evermoving... just like in your post. |
Yes, solid 3rd party launch games, but solid 3rd party games on launch doesnt mean shit in Nintendo case because multiplatforms doesn't sell Nintendo consoles, nobody bought Wii U because of those games because they were already on PS3/Xbox360 and In most cases they were late ports, and offcourse you cant sell Nintendo console on multiplatform ports beacuse strong Nintendo games are selling Nintendo hardware. People asking late ports in order that system have more games outside Nintendo games, so to have more games, more games is always positive thing in any case, but strong Nintendo games are system sellers for Nintendo not multiplatform games.
You are 1st person I saw that said that Wii U's first year "was absolutely excellent", beacuse its well known that it was teriible, weak exslusives, not must have games, and constant drouthg of games (we had 3-4 months without single game), Wii U launch and 1st year lineup actually was one of biggest reason why Wii U failed so hard.
Switch in its 9 months on market will have Zelda BotW, Mario Kart Deluxe, Splatoon 2 and Mario Odyssey, so we talking about some of biggest Nintendo IPs in just 1st 9 months and must have titles, and only Zelda BotW blows away whole 1st year Wii U lineupe.