Bloomberg: Nintendo Traders Signal Switch Could Be Bigger Hit Than the Wii

[GhaudePhaede010]

Miyamotoo said:

GhaudePhaede010 said:

Wii U's first year was absolutely excellent. The problem is, it was equally excellent for Microsoft and Sony. Wii U had 2 Assassin's Creed and CoD titles along with other major multiplatform titles that people SWEAR Nintendo needs if they want to stay relevant. However, the console failed miserably. The first year of Wii U was a clear example that people do not understand what Nintendo needs to do in order to maintain relevance in this industry. They need to separate themselves from their competition as much as possible (through exclusive games and different philosophical practices).

Wii U 1st year was terible, Wii U had solid number of 3rd party games but it was full of late ports whitout any must have exclusive or system seller, and for Nintendo console must have exclusives or system sellers are crucial beacuse those are thigs beacuse people buying Nintendo consoles, ports/multiplatforms were always week on Nintendo platforms. Just Zelda BotW like launch title blown away not just Wii U launch lineupe but hole Wii U 1st year. Not mentione that Wii U had drouths of few monts whitout any realse. Wii U launch and 1st year lineup actually was one of biggest reason why Wii U failed, if Wii U at launch or in its 1 year had games like MK8, Splatoon and Mario Maker, things would be much better.

Did you literally say, "solid" and, "terrible" when talking about Wii U's first year? You are going to debate that one with yourself before you engage me. Meanwhile, most of those, "late ports" were like, one week... and people here, in this thread and other threads on these forums, are asking for... get this now... EVEN MORE LATE PORTS!!!!!!!

Basically, this shows how out of touch the gaming community is when it comes to Nintendo finding success. The goalposts are evermoving... just like in your post.