kopstudent89 said:
Mate. So many sides have used chemical weapons. And has there been legitimate proof it was used or was a chemical plant targetted on purpose or accidentally? We have to stop accepting every piece of news just cause media reports it. I remember the first few years where the rebels where all a peaceful army and ISIS or any extremist islamist war thugs were never part of it even though they were from the start. News keeps changing to satisfy a certain narrative, and only give a snap shot of the current affairs without examining the layers of it and I can assure you the Syrian war is one of the most complex wars in modern history. In any case this is a bad move and I hope it doesn't escalate. This could lead to much worse than the chemical attack and I think it should be put in perspective to such a response from the Trump adminstration |
If this was first time someone used a chemical weapon after Trump has been in office and the air strike was his response to it then I support it more or less.
