By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nem on 06 April 2017
Edit Thread
binary solo said:
Nem said:

Loki? He is part responsible for the rise to popularity of comic book movies. 

 

Nothing wrong with him. Just a different persona than Craig. Craig is more serious in his portraials and Tom is more laid back. Different vibes, that's all.

 

I honestly never liked Craig very much and was a fan of the Pierce brosnan era. But for what they have been doing since, Craig just fits.

Loki didn't put him in the picture as a possible Bond. The Night Manager put him in the picture for being the lead in spy thrillers.

Personally I wonder if Bond has finally reached the end of it's life. Bond movies really should have ended once they finished adapting all of Ian Fleming's books. At that point they should have moved on. I wish whoever licenced the movie rights to Bond had actually made that a limitation: No Bond movies except as adaptaiton of published Flemming books. There's always remakes. And given the campiness of some of the earlier movies, and that Casino Royale itself was a remake and is the best of the Daniel Craig Bond movies, I see no reason why they shouldn't look at more remakes, if they are going to keep Bond on life support.

I know...

That wasnt his question. His question was why people like Tom hidleston. Most of his popularity comes from Loki.

I don't think Bond movies are over at all. They are fun, in the same way mission impossible is. They make money and probably have lower budget than MI, so they will keep doing them. With Craig or without him.