Super_Boom said:
While you're right that the term isn't negative on its own, context should also be taken into account. Like a few others have mentioned, it's almost exclusively used with a negative connotation on forums like this, essentially meaning "useless feature that is bad." It's stupid and simplified, but it's basically the first meaning people jump to. Given the way the OP is framed, I can understand why people are reading it this way. It's basically the same as "casual gamer", which is another term that shouldn't be negative, but is never used in a positive light. I'd compare it less to "handicapped", and more to the word "retard." It's a term to describe people with an actual condition, but has been so tarnished by negative usage that even people in the field try to avoid using it. Is it right, probably not, but context helps to understand why people interpret it differently. |
What, then? Should we add a word with a legimate usage to the banned list?
The problem isn't with people using the word as an insult, it's with people getting upset when the word is used at all, justifying people using it as an insult.
And what should the PC replacement be? "Hardware advertising point"? "Marketing feature"?
Maybe it's just me but it feels very unsavory to give in like that.








