RolStoppable said:
I hope you have survey data to support this argument, but I don't think you have. You are merely arranging various pieces to fit the conclusion that Switch isn't perceived as a successor to the 3DS. There are better explanations for why the 3DS is holding up better than previous handhelds during the transitional period and why Wii U sales are down so much. For the 3DS, it's seeing much more substantial third party support at this point in its life than any of the previous Nintendo handhelds. For the Wii U, production was stopped last year and there have been no new shipments this year. |
You focused on that one phrase... ? Why not the explanations of this?
Wii u production was curtailed... Why Nintendo did that? Because of expecting switch to have an adverse effect to wii u sales and not wanting many wii u units on the shelves after switch launch.
( Wii u production has been only halted in Japan in December. )
As for the data... 3DS has sold 440k between Jan-March and it's yoy up, DS sold 640k in the whole 2011 and it was yoy down by 80%...
Don't say me to wait for the following months for a comparison, because 3DS sales may face a steep drop , it just needs 12k on average weekly sales for the rest 39 weeks to exceed DS transition year sales by 200k.
As regards the third party support... DS didn't have third party support in the year of being replaced ? I really ask. At least it had Pokemon black and white 2, a major first party software.
People even believed ( proof* ) Nintendo when it was saying that ds is not a replacement of gba in spite of all the similarities... Imagine with switch and 3DS!
*FAT DS sold only 18m between 2004-nov2006 and gba sales had just the inevitable normal decline, fat ds didn't have any considerable effect on gba sales at least in the west.







