By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLAMarine on 02 April 2017
Edit Thread
Nem said:
Sigh, this... again.

There are things he didn't like, you are free to disagree but you can't be objectively more correct than he is. Get over it already.

I understand there are things he didn't like but if a reviewer mentioned absolutely hating the gyro-aiming in Splatoon for example and that reviewer fails to mention that stick aiming is an option in the game, would I be out of line for mentioning that the option for stick aiming was available?

twintail said:
Goodnightmoon said:

It is also his prerrogative when he suggest you cannot keep track of the shrines even when you totally can? Not only you can put markers on them from the distance to know where they are but also the map already shows you where they are and wether they are only discovered (orange), opened but not completed (orange and blue) or completed (blue) yet he says you need to do them all from the moment you see them otherwise you lose track. He is just lying.

Ok, so?

The OP isn't talking about shrine tracking. Im not talking about shrine tracking. If you want to do so then go start a new random topic about it. 

This thread's OP will be updated as time goes on. My objections to his review are not restricted to his point about the blood moon mechanic.

Darashiva said:
This is starting to just get silly. Why is it so hard for people to accept someone's opinion of a game not being the same as theirs? That's all it is, no matter how much people try to spin this into some anti-Nintendo agenda. Just get over it already.

I can accept Jim's 7/10 just fine, I'm not asking him to change it. It's just that portions of his review I found to be objectionable.

PieToast said:
It's apparently quantifiable how wrong Jim's opinion is. I mean god forbid someone gives Nintendo some feedback.

Nothing wrong with providing Nintendo feedback provided the feedback is valid. For example, the framerate problem the game had is a valid criticism and recently, a patch was provided that helped to improve framerate.

thismeintiel said:
Green098 said:

It could maybe be more due to the reason was too absurd, nick picky  or not enough of a reason to knock a game down so much. Like when IGN give Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire a 7.8 because of "Too Much Water" recieved negativity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2ACvQpH108

Anyways to say no other base has given a shit about a good 7 is clearly untrue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asCWrjU3pps&t=6s - Mass Effect Andromeda - IGN - 7.7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3b_-BrDPrM - The Last Guardian - IGN - 7.0

Mass Effect Andromeda and The Last Guardian have some pretty high dislike to like ratios so don't tell me no other base has ever given a shit about a good 7 when clearly they have. Athough I personally find these 2 games deserving of their scores a 7 is still low enough, especially in the case of Botw in comparison with its record setting number of 10's to be a flawed review. Especially when you compare Botw's score with Jim's other reviewed games, it's hard to take seriously.

Oh no, they had the audacity to click dislike, thus expressing their dislike. So, did they then do the rational thing and tell them to drink bleach and die and then DDOS attack their site and try to hack the reviewers personal accounts?  And did they continue to make threads almost a month after the review was posted? Or did they just speak their mind and move on? I'm guessing it's the last one.

Please do not lump me in with those people, thismeintiel. That's just not fair.