By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JRPGfan said:
monocle_layton said:
I am very neutral.

In environmental issues however, I am very liberal. Coal production has stayed the same, and yet jobs are being loss.
We should focus on bringing environmental friendly energy to urban areas. Then, to developing regions. Even if global warming is exaggerated, doesn't mean we should focus less on replacing coal and oil

Because of company greed.

Why hire a coal worker, that ll mine, when you can automate it with a machine and robots, that work for a faction of the cost.

Being "less" eviroment friendly, isnt going to magically get any jobs back, its just going to pollute more for no reason.

Those saveings will just go towards the rich that run the company's and not ever trickle down to the coal mine worker, who isnt getting his job back.

 

also:

Global warming isnt exaggerated.

It seems no one takes it seriously, because they dont care what happends down the line.

Trump is 70 years old... he doesnt care what the planet looks like in 40years, he wont be around then.

I am playing devil's advocate

 

Many conservatives claim global warming is exaggerated. I'd take the risk of being wrong and having nothing occur. Even if global warming is some magical agenda by the illumianti, we still gain a lot by transitioning to things like solar energy.