naznatips said:
No one (or very few people) are saying these games are automatically going to be good. That's ridiculous. Just as ridiculous as saying RE5 or SF4 will be automatically good. You can never completley judge quality until a game is released, but hoping said games are good, and anticipating them, is hardly stupid. The really stupid thing is you constantly flip-flop between what you want so that there is no way anyone can win. If it's high quality, but low budget (Zack & Wiki) you complain it's not real support. If it's high budget, but not a franchise you care for (Monster Hunter) you still complain it's not real support. You are looking for a reason to complain. It's called being a pessimist, not a realist. Other people say "I hope this will be good" you say "I don't care it's not real support." You refuse to actually give these games a fair chance because your default point-of-view is so negative that you can't believe anything could possibly be good that's not a sequel to a franchise you've known for 10 years. Hell, even when it is (Tenchu 4), you still complain. You may have thought you were being cleverly sarcastic, but you are just a malcontent. You have yet to prove yourself even capable of providing a "realistic" opinion on anything. You are so caught up in your dark storm cloud of doom that god forbid you actually enjoy gaming. |
Am I finding reasons to complain or are you just trying to find reasons to act like everything is just fine.
How are my opinions unrealistic? Its a fact that third party developers are only giving the Wii minimal support with small projects and questionable quality games. Sorry I don't feel the same need as you to paint every single game given to the Wii by someone not Nintendo as an effort on par with the major projects being put on HD consoles.
My opinions are those of why this is by and large a no win generation. HD gaming has forced a limitation of games that can be made and a focus more so on pre-existing franchises which now have become such expensive endeavors that risks need to be eliminated to ensure profit returns. Meanwhile the Wii is given unremarkable support with games no one really cares that much about. This third party support you say I shold be content with for the Wii would have just been ignoreable shovelware last generation on a console like the PS2.
I'm sorry my reasoning is too complex for you. Let me break it down for you.
- Third party games are being handicapped in the number that can be made, the lack of new franchises or titles resulting in a bottlenecking of gaming all due to the dynamic born of HD gaming.
- Third party games are suffering on the opposite end due to the Wii where companies don't even put enough money into them to make a game that's above PS2 standards.
- Don't mistake my discontent with this dillema as actually suggesting the idea that things can in anyway be changed for the better now, I've given up on expecting change. But forgive me for not being upset when people say things like, "THE DROUGHT IS OVER".
My opinion is fine, it asks nothing unreasonable as it asks nothing at all, the only problem is your inability to stomach anyone's discontent with anything this generation. All you can do is offer the hypothetical, "Oh these bargain bin games might be the good games and the big budget titles might all suck and not sell." Even I have more faith in an artistically castrated big budget projects than what third party developers think the Wii demographic wants.
