Bristow9091 said:
Yeah, it's a shame he'll only last one film like every other villain except Loki... kind of a shame how easily they kill off some iconic villains to be honest, would love to see a villain last maybe 2-3 films over a big story arch or something, but seems like Loki is the only one they actually care about. |
Yes. I'd like this too. But than, you also block new enemies showing up. This is where a TV show would work better. I know they could have the villian not get killed. Than come back in the future. But, the future can be 6 years. With just one or two films in between. People do get forgetful. It's also the problem of the producers don't know if this villian will click. There have been a lot of villians that have been done really bad.
Take Batman and Robin. Forget the movie was total crap. Say someone loved Bane, from that film. They pick him to survive. And be used in the next film. That would of sucked. This is why they usually have villians die, after a film. In Spider-Man's case. We haven't had a long enough time. Without them doing a reboot. To even have someone come back, in some way. You can argue Harry, in the Toby movies. But, that sucked the way SM 3 was structured. Companies also don't want to blow their load, on the first go. This causes them to go with weaker main villians. And can cause the first movie to be kind of boring, annoying. All because people are waiting for Venom, Carnage etc. Not Paste Pot Pete.
