pokoko said:
Same difference. I never really bother trying to tell the two belts apart. Which one did he have before where he almost never defended?
Why would I be interested in some of it? Don't care about the Cena thing or about the battle of the part-timers. I don't really care about watching Shane McMahon, since I can see his one or two big spots on highlights. I'm expecting both women's matches to be overbooked messes. Not sure what you mean about Orton vs. Wyatt, though, since I listed it as one of the matches I would like to see. Corbin vs. Ambrose might be good or it might be "hardcore". RAW tag match could be very good, since it has some great talent involved, but you never know with WWE tag booking. Undertaker vs. Reigns ... eh. I don't know. It will probably have a bunch of big spots but I'm not expecting much out of the Undertaker. It will probably be a "passing of the torch" match, anyway. |
Ambrose passively defended the IC title... I think. It was Reigns who never had one title defence after he took the U.S. title. His only defence was dropping it to Jericho... months after he won it... 30 day clause needs to come back.
