5 years + $40M = Mass Effect Andromeda

[Nem]

UnderstatedCornHole said:

Nem said:

No, it really isn't. This is the same BS ME3 got with the ending, with people hating on it like the game was bad. 

If you don't enjoy it, don't play it. Don't come and tell me that the flak is deserved when it's disproportionate.

And by the way, you so don't know me. I do bet you're the kind that overeacts everything though.

Lol true about over reacting on my part. I just don't sit with the appeasement of releases that aren't as good as they should be. ME3 was damn fine game but the ending was a disgrace because it pissed all over the idea of your actions affecting the story. It was clearly not the ending that the developers intended it to be. I don't believe Andromeda is the whole game the developers intended to be and i think to say otherwise is being disingenuous when you think about it.

Same can be said for the likes of FFXV, that is a good game, very good but it needed another 6 months to make it the game we were waiting for.. Andromeda is different though, it is just not a good game deserving of the ME name. It's not a bad game though

Just can't celebrate or defend that personally, it's a huge step back.

It's not a step back. It isn't a technological step up that many of us would expect. But the gameplay is still top notch.

If you don't want to play it because of some derpy faces, it's your loss, not mine. Don't come tell us that breaks the game, because it doesn't.