By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGPolyglot said:
potato_hamster said:

There's a difference between writing a full-on essay, and making post after post that indicates that you don't have the slightest idea of how the world actually functions, and spout nonsencal utopian ideas that have no merit even being mentioned to anyone outside of an introduction to philosophy classroom.


The ideas you continue to post have absolutely no merit. Expanding upon them isn't going to add any type of credibility to your arguments.

I'm not looking for a utopia. Of course there'll always be problems. I'm just looking for a world where there isn't massive amounts of food wasted while millions of people are starving, and where people are hoarding billions that they'll never spend while others can't afford to pay their rent.

You're arguing for a mass redistrubution of wealth. That is delusional and utopian. You're looking for a world that will never ever exist. It's not even remotely possible. It's a dream world that requires people to ignore human nature and the genetically ingrained desire to put yourself and your loved ones above everyone else.