DélioPT said:
Theyalways had 2 products, yes. But the price point difference was a result of that. If they lower the price of the Switch to 269, for example, and introduce a Switch Pro at 329, what's the problem with that? Different versions with different price tags. And with time the price will go down a bit more. It's true that Nintendo isn't going to fight a power war, but they can't be oblivious to what Sony and MS bring to the market because they need to be competitive and give consumers 3rd party games that are good when compared to the better versions. |
Actualy they usual have more products than 2, just look at last year, Wii U at $300, New 3DS XL at $199, New 3DS at around $150 and 2DS at $100.That's basically 4 price points, from $100 to 300.
Dont look to much in Nintendo PR talk, they also said that Switch isnt successor to 3DS, but you will see how they changing their song when 3DS dies.
Having just $270 and $330 price point would be bad for Nintendo because for first time they wouldn't have in generation lower price point ($150-200). They will certainly work to have Switch at lower price, and most logical and most certain thing would be to release Switch Mini/Pocket for just handheld playing after 3DS dies for around $200, and I am certain they will do exatly that.
You do realise that Wii was 20-30x times less powerful and still sold better than PS3/Xbox360. If Switch sales good, 3rd parties will port their games to Switch despite power difference, what Switch will offer compared to PS4/XB1/Pro/Scorpio is play on go.







