By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
BraLoD said:
Funny my thread got back at making some people mad, lol.

People asking for it to be locked because can't stand an opinion, people going for personal attacks, fanboysm, and severe lack of actually trying to understand anything coming here to try to crack a joke on themselves...

The Switch launch has actually boosted my opinion on it, weak hardware already having problems with a first party launch title that was developed for their last system, overpriced hardware and companion pieces, Nintendo not even making a custom chip for it and releasing a Shield system with their brand written on it...

Yeah, going 3rd party would be great.

Like I said regarding the response to the Jim Sterling review of Breath of the Wild, irrational arguments are going to draw a stronger reaction than rational ones.

All you do here is reiterate your original "Nintendo should go third party because that's what I'd like them do" without bringing anything of substance to the table. Actually, now you are doing more. You are arguing the same thing in the face of success which means that not only will there be no financial reason for Nintendo to entertain the idea of going third party, but the market showing a positive reception of Nintendo's latest console also means that people definitely like what Nintendo is doing, so there's no such thing as even remote agreement that Nintendo should go third party.

I agree that this thread shouldn't get locked. It should get bumped every few months to laugh at you.

This, exactly. 

To OP: You're telling them to go third party just because Nintendo games aren't available on your platform. Either that, or your just begging to start a war.



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.