Jim Sterling’s site under attack after Zelda: BotW review

[Metallox]

golfgt170 said:

Metallox said:

I hope you understand that a lot of these notes are just plain and simple trolling, tens and zeros included.

Overall, can't believe there's this much buzz just because the game dropped one point in Metacritic. Jim's review is decent and seems honest (and I agree with him on some points, there's a reason why I haven't truly enjoyed 30 of 35 hours in this game).

Already answered: ALL games in metacritic user score, get troll 0%. No exceptions there. What i meant is that this zelda is way to low compared to the 97% it got even when compared to the other zelda games

Metacritic wasn't as popular back then as it is today, though. Breath of the Wild arrived with a 98 in a time when reviews seem to be serious business for a few people. The GTA games are on a similar position, for instance.

Also, consider that the game's got a lot of negative ratings, do you honestly think that at least half of these notes could be honest? http://www.metacritic.com/game/switch/the-legend-of-zelda-breath-of-the-wild/user-reviews?dist=negative There are a few comments with a little credibility, like that one of zeroex_15, but if a lot of people are going to put 0 to a game that they just didn't like without taking in consideration at least some of the game's merits, like physics, NPCs, etc., IDK, then this 7.6 was bound to happen.