WagnerPaiva on 13 March 2017
| vivster said: The problem is that people don't realize that there are 2 thought schools of review scores. The first one is to try to assess the sum of a games merits and adjust accordingly to its failures. Those are the mid to high reviews. The other is going by fun factor. Judging a game on how much you enjoyed it overall without taking into account the individual merits or failures. The score is based on what feeling you left the game with. Those are the very high and very low reviews. Neither of them is right or wrong. What is wrong however is calling every review score you don't like "clickbait". |
Yes! That I hate so much: How many times some reviewer bad mouthed a masterpiece because it "did not had everything on the checklist", like online multiplayer, or it wasn´t open world. Like a game have to be all things all time.
The "merits" of the game often are checks in a list this reviewer has.
Also, a lot of these reviewers are not real gamers, they play so much stuff, their taste is tainted
My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.
