By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mummelmann said:
Wyrdness said:

Firstly get off your high horse as who said you don't know how open world games work, go on highlight a quote.

Secondly that's all well and good but I'll say it again 8-10 hours is nothing in this game even by open world standards you can spend literally 3 hours doing nothing just because you're playing around with mechanics or just exploring something out of curiosity. I guarantee you what you saw in your one hour is not even 1% of what's coming your way in the game.

So, no comments on the actual post, but you keep on insisting that I don't understand the genre? You implied that I didn't understand how open world games work by stating that "8-10 hours in a game like this isn't a lot" and your entire second paragraph is devoted to the exact same thing, so how on earth are you not telling me I don't know how open world games work?

You're literally writing to me as one would a person who has no clue about open world games, and it's right here in this very quote and impossible to miss.

I have not said that it's a bad game, or even anything close to that, your reaction would seem to suggest that I have, and I admitted readily to having only played a short time. In that short time, I noticed a lot of things I liked and some things I didn't and I wrote them out in detail, I also added that I've never in my life played a 98/100 game (closest for me is probably Half-Life 2 or Baldur's Gate 2).

1: I answered the OP to the best of my ability, and issues like somewhat empty world, camera issues, pop-in issues, the overeager breakage and incredibly annoying climbing doesn't exactly get better with time, so I noted things that would detract from the experience in my view.

2: I stated clearly that I had not played for a long time and thus was unable to offer a proper, in-depth opinion on the game as a whole.

3: I also stated that some of these issues are a hallmark of the genre and I even suggested that this game does certain things better than other open world games, so I'm not talking shit to make you or anyone else mad.

In short; I'm not the one who needs to get off the horse, calm down. I'm not saying anything other than it being unlikely that I would agree with a 98/100 score, which is more or less perfect and that a 98/100 doesn't exist in my world. When there were several issues even during my 1 hour session and most things were pertaining to the mechanics themselves, which remain unchanged besides change of gear and skill levels, I consider these to be legitimate concerns and I should be allowed as much, despite the game being universally loved (by myself as well). Are people in here still this poor at accepting criticism of things they enjoy?

No comment on the post because no offence you're acting like a spoilt child throwing a tantrum, I'm not writing to you in anyway other than to point out that what you've seen is not that much at all even in comparison to the standards of open world games in general but you're throwing a wobbler like someone with an entitled right to not be questioned, get over yourself if you want to take it there then I'll be happy to respond in the manner you're looking for and send you packing like many previous children on net who threw their toys out the pram.

You've not highlighted one part not one quote that suggested you were told that you don't unbderstand the genre yet you keep pushing the notion as well as taking the stance like you've been attacked, if that's what you're looking for just say it now and I'll give you what you're looking for because as things go nothing said to you even matches the context you're trying to argue.

 

Moderated ~ CGI