By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
barneystinson69 said:
Jumpin said:

Multiculturalism has worked all my life, we have risen to higher points than any monoculture society ever could. Wealth, technology, and society, we are rich in it all. We give the opportunity for every person to achieve their greatest potential, and our cities are the envy of the world.

It is no coincidence that the multicultural cities are the greatest of the western world, and the bumpkinized monoculture are the lowest stratum. 

We have tried the violent nationalist experiment you advocate  before, and to put it mildly, we became the most shameful society of modern history. It ultimately left our Europe in shambles, and it was through progressive multiculturalism that we enriched ourselves and grew quickly to high wealth and greatness.

In the end, multiculturalism is a sign of greatness and reproduces greatness. Monoculturalism is a sign of failure and bumpkinization. Aggressive monocultural nationalism is a catalyst for the decline and destruction of civilization.

Right, right. Ghettos, rape culture, terrorism, all of this and more. You know Europe was a mostly homogenous society for 1000s of years, and guess what, that was the society that led to the renaissance, the creation of democracy, as well as countless other inventions and people that advanced the world. On the other hand, a "multicultural" middle east faces civil war, ethnic tentions, religous wars, and lots of other crap that we inport into our society. Just look at Yugoslavia. A country that decends into many different wars, a "multicultural" society that kills one another because they can't agree on anything. But no, thats different! Just look at the what mayor of London says about terrorism: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sadiq-khan-london-mayor-terrorism-attacks-part-and-parcel-major-cities-new-york-bombing-a7322846.html

 

This wasn't a problem in Europe a few decades ago. You know, before "multiculturalism". :)

And were also mostly at war with each other.

As for London, it has had to deal with terrorism since the 1800s, long before multicultural society arose. Londoners pretty much accept that it will happen at some point but also realise we're far less likely to die of terrorism than being hit by a car. 

Also, Yugoslavia isn't what I would call "multicultural" as the term is associated with a degree of integration, whereas Yugoslavia is a culture of separate nationalist idealogues creating artificial tensions. Very much the monoculture Jumpin was advocating against.